REET vs. FUSD.L
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and FUSD.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc) are both exchange-traded funds - REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while FUSD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REET returned 1.87%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for FUSD.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUSD.L.
Performance
REET vs. FUSD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than FUSD.L's 6.93% return.
REET
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.04%
FUSD.L
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 22.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- —
REET vs. FUSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 8.47% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 6.56% |
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 6.93% | 16.47% | 15.86% | 17.14% | -12.08% | 24.36% | 10.46% | 28.68% | -6.45% | 15.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and FUSD.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017 | 0.37 |
The correlation between REET and FUSD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
REET vs. FUSD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REET
FUSD.L
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
REET
FUSD.L
Financial Services
REET
FUSD.L
Basic Materials
REET
-
FUSD.L
Communication Services
REET
-
FUSD.L
Consumer Cyclical
REET
-
FUSD.L
Consumer Defensive
REET
-
FUSD.L
Energy
REET
-
FUSD.L
Healthcare
REET
-
FUSD.L
Industrials
REET
-
FUSD.L
Technology
REET
-
FUSD.L
Utilities
REET
-
FUSD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. FUSD.L — Risk / Return Rank
REET
FUSD.L
REET vs. FUSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REET | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.38 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.77 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 12.12 | -7.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REET | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.13 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.71 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.76 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
REET vs. FUSD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than FUSD.L's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and FUSD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -35.98% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -7.94% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -17.60% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -20.25% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -1.20% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -4.19% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 1.82% | +0.70% |
Volatility
REET vs. FUSD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) at 2.71%. This indicates that REET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | FUSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 2.71% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 7.74% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 10.35% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 14.69% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 15.80% | +3.05% |
REET vs. FUSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FUSD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
REET vs. FUSD.L - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than FUSD.L's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 1.44% | 1.47% | 0.47% | 1.04% | 0.56% | 0.94% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.41% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REET and FUSD.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSD.L.
REET is categorized as REIT, while FUSD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.25% for FUSD.L.
Find the right allocation for REET and FUSD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer