RDTE vs. GLDY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 24.27% vs 11.50% for GLDY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDTE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDY.

Performance

RDTE vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -4.78% return.

RDTE

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 10.92%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDY

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -6.85%
• YTD: -4.78%
• 6M: -2.80%
• 1Y: 11.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	10.92%	16.28%
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	-4.78%	15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and GLDY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.17

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 49
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

GLDY

GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 19
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RDTE	GLDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.57	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	0.78	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.13	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	0.74	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.20	1.98	+7.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RDTE vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDTE	GLDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	0.57	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.42	+0.48

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and GLDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	GLDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-15.57%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-15.57%	+6.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-15.33%	+12.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-4.02%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	5.83%	-3.18%

Volatility

RDTE vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.95%. This indicates that RDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	GLDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.84%	4.95%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	18.57%	-5.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09%	20.14%	-3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.32%	19.71%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	19.71%	-0.39%

RDTE vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.18%, less than GLDY's 48.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF	48.51%	37.38%	0.00%
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	46.18%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and GLDY in my portfolio?

RDTE and GLDY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTE or GLDY?

RDTE has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to GLDY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs GLDY's -15.57%.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or GLDY?

On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 24.27% vs 11.50% for GLDY. On fees, RDTE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTE or GLDY?

Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or GLDY?

RDTE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or GLDY?

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 48.51%, compared with 46.18% for RDTE.

What is the main difference between RDTE and GLDY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RDTE and 0.99% for GLDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.