RCAT vs. COST
RCAT (Red Cat Holdings, Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. RCAT operates in Software - Application (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, RCAT returned 31.32%/yr vs 22.05%/yr for COST. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCAT vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCAT achieves a 57.12% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.35% return.
RCAT
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 20.15%
- YTD
- 57.12%
- 6M
- 50.67%
- 1Y
- 52.70%
- 3Y*
- 139.89%
- 5Y*
- 31.32%
- 10Y*
- —
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
RCAT vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 57.12% | -38.29% | 1,360.23% | -6.38% | -54.81% | -30.67% | 172.73% | 73,233.33% | -94.74% | -28.57% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 15.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCAT and COST is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.04 |
The correlation between RCAT and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RCAT:
-$0.78
COST:
$26.51
RCAT:
25.90
COST:
1.11
RCAT:
$52.98M
COST:
$293.59B
RCAT:
$2.86M
COST:
$11.12B
RCAT:
-$79.24M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCAT vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
RCAT
COST
RCAT vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCAT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.98 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.22 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | -0.51 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCAT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | -0.18 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.98 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.59 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
RCAT vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -99.21%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCAT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.21% | -53.39% | -45.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.08% | -15.38% | -44.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.16% | -20.74% | -46.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.25% | -31.40% | -60.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.23% | -10.93% | -17.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -13.36% | -52.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.86% | 7.15% | +22.71% |
Volatility
RCAT vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a higher volatility of 41.78% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.71%. This indicates that RCAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCAT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.78% | 7.71% | +34.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 84.03% | 14.53% | +69.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.85% | 18.79% | +101.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.96% | 22.71% | +92.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29,243.53% | 21.95% | +29,221.58% |
Dividends
RCAT vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
RCAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RCAT vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Cat Holdings, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RCAT and COST have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCAT has higher volatility (41.78%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCAT dropped -99.21% vs COST's -53.39%.
RCAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCAT and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer