R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L
R3NK.DE (RENK Group AG) and SRP.L (Serco Group) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — R3NK.DE in Aerospace & Defense, SRP.L in Specialty Business Services. Over the past year, R3NK.DE returned -35.27% vs 30.84% for SRP.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
R3NK.DE is traded in EUR, while SRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SRP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R3NK.DE achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly higher than SRP.L's -7.36% return.
R3NK.DE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 6M
- -9.39%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRP.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 30.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
R3NK.DE RENK Group AG | -5.11% | 194.05% | 5.97% |
SRP.L Serco Group | -7.36% | 79.32% | -11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between R3NK.DE and SRP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
R3NK.DE
SRP.L
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RENK Group AG (R3NK.DE) and Serco Group (SRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| R3NK.DE | SRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.27 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.41 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 4.62 | -5.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| R3NK.DE | SRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 1.46 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | -0.02 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R3NK.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, smaller than the maximum SRP.L drawdown of -81.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R3NK.DE and SRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R3NK.DE | SRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.87% | -81.43% | +30.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.57% | -21.75% | -28.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.47% | -35.88% | -6.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -46.95% | +19.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.58% | 6.66% | +23.92% |
Volatility
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L - Volatility Comparison
RENK Group AG (R3NK.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.49% compared to Serco Group (SRP.L) at 6.32%. This indicates that R3NK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R3NK.DE | SRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.49% | 6.32% | +9.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.41% | 16.13% | +22.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.85% | 21.05% | +32.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.19% | 23.68% | +37.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.19% | 30.74% | +30.45% |
Dividends
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L - Dividend Comparison
R3NK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3NK.DE RENK Group AG | 0.00% | 0.78% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRP.L Serco Group | 1.77% | 1.53% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.20% | 1.48% |
Financials
R3NK.DE vs. SRP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RENK Group AG and Serco Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
R3NK.DE and SRP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for R3NK.DE and SRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer