QYLD vs. XLY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QYLD returned 9.77%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for XLY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.

Performance

QYLD vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 9.77%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.57% annualized return.

QYLD

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 22.45%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

XLY

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: -3.17%
• 6M: -1.81%
• 1Y: 9.63%
• 3Y*: 13.63%
• 5Y*: 6.99%
• 10Y*: 12.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.05%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	-3.17%	7.37%	26.51%	39.64%	-36.27%	27.93%	29.63%	28.39%	1.58%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and XLY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013	0.71

The correlation between QYLD and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QYLD vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLD	XLY
Technology	53.8%	0.9%
Communication Services	15.8%	1.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	97.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	0.1%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QYLD vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

XLY

XLY Risk / Return Rank: 18
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QYLD	XLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	0.54	+2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	0.87	+2.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.10	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	0.65	+3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.31	2.01	+24.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QYLD vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QYLD	XLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	0.54	+2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.30	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.57	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.42	+0.16

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and XLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLD	XLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-59.05%	+34.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.97%	-14.98%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-26.01%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.61%	-39.67%	+15.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	-39.67%	+14.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-7.15%	+6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-9.56%	+5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	4.80%	-3.94%

Volatility

QYLD vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 2.86%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLD	XLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	5.32%	-2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.44%	13.22%	-5.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.84%	18.09%	-9.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.73%	23.80%	-9.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	22.06%	-6.55%

QYLD vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLD vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.55%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund	0.77%	0.79%	0.72%	0.78%	1.00%	0.53%	0.82%	1.28%	1.34%	1.20%	1.71%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLD and XLY in my portfolio?

QYLD and XLY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QYLD or XLY?

XLY has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to QYLD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs XLY's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, QYLD or XLY?

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.57% vs 9.77% for QYLD. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QYLD or XLY?

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLD or XLY?

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QYLD or XLY?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.55%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

What is the main difference between QYLD and XLY?

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.13% for XLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.