PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. TOBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Touchstone Active Bond Fund (TOBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than TOBAX's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has outperformed TOBAX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while TOBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.01% annualized return.


QYLD

1D
1.07%
1M
0.23%
YTD
7.05%
6M
8.87%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
9.77%

TOBAX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.05%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
TOBAX
Touchstone Active Bond Fund
-0.19%7.66%2.22%6.38%-14.20%-1.34%9.93%10.11%-1.94%3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and TOBAX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.03

Over the past year, QYLD and TOBAX have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. TOBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TOBAX
TOBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TOBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TOBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Touchstone Active Bond Fund (TOBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLDTOBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.23

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

1.65

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.31

4.91

+21.40

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the TOBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and TOBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLDTOBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.26

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.02

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.42

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.89

-0.31

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than TOBAX's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and TOBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDTOBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-19.73%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-2.88%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-6.12%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-19.73%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-19.73%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.88%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.43%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.97%

-0.11%

Volatility

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Touchstone Active Bond Fund (TOBAX) at 1.32%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDTOBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

1.32%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

2.73%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.84%

3.78%

+5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

5.79%

+8.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

4.81%

+10.70%

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TOBAX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. TOBAX - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, more than TOBAX's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.55%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
TOBAX
Touchstone Active Bond Fund
4.04%3.52%3.72%3.63%3.10%2.24%2.58%2.59%2.79%2.29%2.65%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and TOBAX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to TOBAX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs TOBAX's -19.73%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and TOBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer