QYLD vs. SPYI
QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while SPYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. QYLD is passively managed, while SPYI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QYLD returned 13.42%/yr vs 15.60%/yr for SPYI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYI.
Performance
QYLD vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 5.97% return.
QYLD
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 22.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
SPYI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.05% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -4.23% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 5.97% | 16.67% | 19.03% | 18.09% | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD and SPYI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QYLD and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
QYLD vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QYLD
SPYI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QYLD
SPYI
Communication Services
QYLD
SPYI
Consumer Cyclical
QYLD
SPYI
Consumer Defensive
QYLD
SPYI
Healthcare
QYLD
SPYI
Industrials
QYLD
SPYI
Utilities
QYLD
SPYI
Basic Materials
QYLD
SPYI
Energy
QYLD
SPYI
Financial Services
QYLD
SPYI
Real Estate
QYLD
SPYI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD
SPYI
QYLD vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QYLD | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.40 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 2.63 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.31 | 13.60 | +12.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QYLD | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.06 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.17 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
QYLD vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and SPYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -16.47% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -7.72% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -16.47% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -2.11% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -1.80% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 1.49% | -0.63% |
Volatility
QYLD vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.87% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 7.78% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.84% | 9.88% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 12.95% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 12.95% | +2.56% |
QYLD vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLD vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison
QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, less than SPYI's 11.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.55% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 11.83% | 11.70% | 12.04% | 12.01% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD and SPYI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYI has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to QYLD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs SPYI's -16.47%.
On 3-year performance, SPYI leads with 15.60% vs 13.42% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPYI has performed better with a 15.60% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYI.
SPYI has the higher dividend yield at 11.83%, compared with 11.55% for QYLD.
QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.68% for SPYI.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QYLD and SPYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer