PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. PTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. PTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than PTY's -3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has outperformed PTY with an annualized return of 9.77%, while PTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.37% annualized return.


QYLD

1D
1.07%
1M
0.23%
YTD
7.05%
6M
8.87%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
9.77%

PTY

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
-3.69%
6M
-4.44%
1Y
-4.39%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
-0.64%
10Y*
8.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. PTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.05%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
-3.69%-0.51%19.87%22.56%-18.71%0.40%3.24%35.36%2.49%26.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and PTY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. PTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PTY
PTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
PTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. PTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLDPTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

0.93

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

-0.29

+4.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.31

-0.57

+26.88

QYLD vs. PTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the PTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and PTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLDPTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

-0.41

+2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

-0.04

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.40

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.46

+0.12

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. PTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum PTY drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and PTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDPTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-60.86%

+36.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-15.44%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-16.04%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-41.38%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-46.55%

+21.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-12.59%

+11.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-8.61%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

7.72%

-6.86%

Volatility

QYLD vs. PTY - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) at 2.70%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDPTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.70%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

7.49%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.84%

10.82%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

17.40%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

21.20%

-5.69%

QYLD vs. PTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTY's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. PTY - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, less than PTY's 12.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTY
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
12.03%11.05%9.92%10.77%13.12%9.16%8.74%8.37%10.63%9.48%12.09%11.92%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.55%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and PTY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to PTY (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs PTY's -60.86%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and PTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer