QUBT vs. SPAXX
QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) is a stock, while SPAXX (Fidelity Government Money Market Fund) is Money Market fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, QUBT returned 9.20%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for SPAXX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
QUBT vs. SPAXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than SPAXX's 1.37% return.
QUBT
- 1D
- 4.97%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- -19.68%
- 1Y
- -23.72%
- 3Y*
- 90.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SPAXX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
QUBT vs. SPAXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 1.85% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -55.72% | -45.87% |
SPAXX Fidelity Government Money Market Fund | 1.37% | 3.96% | 1.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBT and SPAXX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBT vs. SPAXX — Risk / Return Rank
QUBT
SPAXX
QUBT vs. SPAXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Fidelity Government Money Market Fund (SPAXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUBT | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUBT | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 3.65 | -3.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 2.13 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 2.12 | -2.07 |
Drawdowns
QUBT vs. SPAXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than SPAXX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and SPAXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBT | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | 0.00% | -97.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.37% | 0.00% | -74.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.40% | 0.00% | -82.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | 0.00% | -95.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.31% | 0.00% | -59.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.96% | 0.00% | -72.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.08% | 0.00% | +48.08% |
Volatility
QUBT vs. SPAXX - Volatility Comparison
Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a higher volatility of 36.37% compared to Fidelity Government Money Market Fund (SPAXX) at 0.28%. This indicates that QUBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBT | SPAXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.37% | 0.28% | +36.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.03% | 0.72% | +66.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 106.87% | 1.03% | +105.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.10% | 0.69% | +132.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 177.68% | 0.69% | +176.99% |
Dividends
QUBT vs. SPAXX - Dividend Comparison
QUBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPAXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPAXX Fidelity Government Money Market Fund | 3.59% | 3.88% | 1.53% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBT and SPAXX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBT has higher volatility (36.37%) compared to SPAXX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs SPAXX's 0.00%.
SPAXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBT and SPAXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer