QUAL vs. VRT
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QUAL returned 11.82%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QUAL vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.
QUAL
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
QUAL vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 7.89% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -9.88% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and VRT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between QUAL and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
VRT
QUAL vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUAL | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 6.53 | -4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 18.20 | -8.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUAL | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.79 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 1.03 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.00 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -71.24% | +37.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -24.78% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -61.28% | +43.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -71.24% | +43.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -20.11% | +18.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -16.22% | +12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 8.89% | -6.91% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.12%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 16.60% | -13.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 45.55% | -36.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.01% | 58.11% | -46.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 61.81% | -44.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 54.61% | -36.50% |
Dividends
QUAL vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and VRT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to QUAL (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer