PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUAL vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than FLOT's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 14.19%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.03% annualized return.


QUAL

1D
0.32%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.26%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
14.19%

FLOT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.15%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*
3.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUAL vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
7.89%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.87%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and FLOT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2013

0.15

The correlation between QUAL and FLOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUALFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

3.22

-1.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

11.27

-9.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

104.83

-94.87

QUAL vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and FLOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUALFLOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

6.54

-4.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

2.38

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.73

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.66

+0.13

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and FLOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-13.54%

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-0.43%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-1.57%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-2.36%

-25.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-13.54%

-20.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.02%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-0.21%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

0.05%

+1.93%

Volatility

QUAL vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.20%. This indicates that QUAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUALFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

0.20%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

0.62%

+8.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

0.75%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

1.77%

+15.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

4.15%

+13.96%

QUAL vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QUAL and FLOT have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUAL vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than FLOT's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.54%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.88%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUAL and FLOT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUAL has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FLOT (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs FLOT's -13.54%.

On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.19% vs 3.03% for FLOT. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.19% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL and FLOT have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.88% for QUAL.

QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer