QTWO vs. ENV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QTWO (Q2 Holdings, Inc.) and ENV (Envestnet, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QTWO vs. ENV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Envestnet, Inc. (ENV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QTWO

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -10.59%
• YTD: -37.89%
• 6M: -39.02%
• 1Y: -50.89%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: -13.94%
• 10Y*: 5.15%

ENV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTWO vs. ENV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc.	-37.89%	-28.31%	131.86%	61.56%	-66.18%	-37.22%	56.06%	63.63%	34.46%	27.73%
ENV Envestnet, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	27.50%	-19.74%	-22.23%	-3.58%	18.18%	41.55%	-1.32%	41.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QTWO and ENV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014	0.39

The correlation between QTWO and ENV shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) QTWO : $821.58M ENV : $1.34B
Gross Profit (TTM) QTWO : $456.61M ENV : $911.20M
EBITDA (TTM) QTWO : $105.55M ENV : -$92.97M

Return for Risk

QTWO vs. ENV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTWO

QTWO Risk / Return Rank: 4
QTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
QTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
QTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
QTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
QTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTWO vs. ENV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Envestnet, Inc. (ENV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTWO	ENV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTWO	ENV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	QTWO	ENV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.45%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.20%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QTWO	ENV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.22%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.12%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.29%	—	—

Dividends

QTWO vs. ENV - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTWO nor ENV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTWO and ENV in my portfolio?

QTWO and ENV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.