QTUM vs. XDIV.TO
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 27.81%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for XDIV.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QTUM is traded in USD, while XDIV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XDIV.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 44.14% return, which is significantly higher than XDIV.TO's 17.68% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 44.14%
- 6M
- 39.20%
- 1Y
- 80.80%
- 3Y*
- 48.48%
- 5Y*
- 27.81%
- 10Y*
- —
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 18.16%
- 1Y
- 36.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 44.14% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 17.61% | 31.02% | 10.48% | 14.68% | -5.50% | 33.37% | -5.29% | 30.52% | -12.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and XDIV.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.40 |
The correlation between QTUM and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
XDIV.TO
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTUM
XDIV.TO
Industrials
QTUM
XDIV.TO
-
Communication Services
QTUM
XDIV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
XDIV.TO
Healthcare
QTUM
XDIV.TO
-
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
XDIV.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
XDIV.TO
-
Energy
QTUM
-
XDIV.TO
Financial Services
QTUM
-
XDIV.TO
Real Estate
QTUM
-
XDIV.TO
-
Utilities
QTUM
-
XDIV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
XDIV.TO
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.81 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.32 | 11.19 | -5.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.76 | 37.59 | -17.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 4.21 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 1.10 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.71 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -46.32% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -3.31% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -12.20% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -24.74% | -13.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.53% | -0.76% | -5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -6.35% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 0.98% | +3.12% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.51%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | 2.51% | +10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 6.83% | +15.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.73% | 8.82% | +18.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 12.47% | +14.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.34% | 17.77% | +9.57% |
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.74% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.31% | 3.90% | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.15% | 3.76% | 4.85% | 4.24% | 5.13% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer