PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTUM vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 44.14% return, which is significantly higher than AIQ's 26.70% return.


QTUM

1D
3.25%
1M
8.85%
YTD
44.14%
6M
39.20%
1Y
80.80%
3Y*
48.48%
5Y*
27.81%
10Y*

AIQ

1D
3.07%
1M
3.42%
YTD
26.70%
6M
25.19%
1Y
55.14%
3Y*
33.87%
5Y*
17.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
44.14%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.44%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
26.70%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and AIQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.87

The correlation between QTUM and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTUM vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTUM
AIQ

Technology

85.1%
73.3%

Industrials

8.7%
4.2%

Communication Services

4.9%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
8.5%

Healthcare

0.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QTUM
85.1%
AIQ
73.3%

Industrials

QTUM
8.7%
AIQ
4.2%

Communication Services

QTUM
4.9%
AIQ
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QTUM
0.7%
AIQ
8.5%

Healthcare

QTUM
0.6%
AIQ
0.4%

Basic Materials

QTUM

-

AIQ

-

Consumer Defensive

QTUM

-

AIQ

-

Energy

QTUM

-

AIQ

-

Financial Services

QTUM

-

AIQ
0.4%

Real Estate

QTUM

-

AIQ

-

Utilities

QTUM

-

AIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTUMAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.38

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

3.36

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.76

11.43

+8.32

QTUM vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTUMAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.24

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.68

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.79

+0.24

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUMAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-44.66%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-16.47%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

-26.35%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-44.66%

+6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-8.13%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-9.79%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

4.84%

-0.74%

Volatility

QTUM vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 13.41% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) at 12.72%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUMAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.41%

12.72%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

20.70%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.73%

24.76%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

25.63%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.34%

25.67%

+1.67%

QTUM vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTUM vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than AIQ's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.15%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.74%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM and AIQ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to AIQ (12.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.81% vs 17.37% for AIQ. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 12.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.81% return vs 17.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.

QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.68% for AIQ.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer