QS vs. SVM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QS (QuantumScape Corporation) and SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) are both stocks. QS operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, QS returned -24.41%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for SVM. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QS vs. SVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QS achieves a -26.49% return, which is significantly lower than SVM's 27.95% return.

QS

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: -26.49%
• 6M: -39.21%
• 1Y: 85.47%
• 3Y*: 6.73%
• 5Y*: -24.41%
• 10Y*: —

SVM

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -20.96%
• YTD: 27.95%
• 6M: 36.46%
• 1Y: 156.34%
• 3Y*: 52.84%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: 18.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QS vs. SVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QS QuantumScape Corporation	-26.49%	100.77%	-25.32%	22.57%	-74.45%	-73.72%	757.36%
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	27.95%	179.29%	14.88%	-10.33%	-20.60%	-43.52%	-12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between QS and SVM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020	0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap QS : $4.68B SVM : $2.35B
EPS QS : -$0.72 SVM : -$0.05
PB Ratio QS : 4.22 SVM : 2.50
Total Revenue (TTM) QS : $0.00 SVM : $437.11M
Gross Profit (TTM) QS : -$49.03M SVM : $254.02M
EBITDA (TTM) QS : -$378.92M SVM : $185.32M

Return for Risk

QS vs. SVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QS

QS Risk / Return Rank: 69
QS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QS Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QS Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QS Martin Ratio Rank: 61

SVM

SVM Risk / Return Rank: 88
SVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SVM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SVM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QS vs. SVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QS	SVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	2.31	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.52	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	4.57	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.00	12.47	-10.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QS vs. SVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QS Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the SVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QS and SVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QS	SVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	2.31	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	0.22	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.17	-0.22

Drawdowns

QS vs. SVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QS drawdown since its inception was -97.36%, roughly equal to the maximum SVM drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QS and SVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QS	SVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.36%	-98.00%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.68%	-34.46%	-33.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.93%	-42.86%	-31.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.45%	-68.10%	-23.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.18%	-46.09%	-48.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.55%	-71.67%	-13.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.96%	12.59%	+30.37%

Volatility

QS vs. SVM - Volatility Comparison

QuantumScape Corporation (QS) and Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) have volatilities of 26.40% and 25.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QS	SVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.40%	25.49%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.57%	55.03%	-6.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.45%	68.20%	+35.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	85.88%	55.30%	+30.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.01%	61.63%	+44.38%

Dividends

QS vs. SVM - Dividend Comparison

QS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QS QuantumScape Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc.	0.23%	0.30%	0.83%	0.95%	0.84%	0.66%	0.37%	0.44%	1.19%	0.76%	0.43%	2.13%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QS and SVM in my portfolio?

QS and SVM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QS or SVM?

QS has higher volatility (26.40%) compared to SVM (25.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QS dropped -97.36% vs SVM's -98.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.