QQQI vs. MEUD.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. QQQI is actively managed, while MEUD.L is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 25.86% vs 16.91% for MEUD.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.

Performance

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQQI is traded in USD, while MEUD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MEUD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 5.24% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEUD.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 5.24%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 16.91%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	9.93%	18.62%	19.83%
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc	5.24%	36.05%	2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and MEUD.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024	0.41

The correlation between QQQI and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQI	MEUD.L
Technology	53.3%	9.4%
Communication Services	15.7%	3.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.3%	12.6%
Industrials	3.3%	20.3%
Utilities	1.5%	4.4%
Basic Materials	1.2%	5.1%
Energy	0.7%	5.3%
Financial Services	0.3%	23.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.2%

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

MEUD.L

MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQI	MEUD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.16	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	1.71	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.21	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	1.46	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.98	5.19	+6.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQI	MEUD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.16	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	0.35	+0.87

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -36.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and MEUD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	MEUD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-36.31%	+16.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-11.53%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.26%	-2.76%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-9.39%	+7.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	3.25%	-1.09%

Volatility

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 3.92%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	MEUD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	3.92%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	12.01%	-1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	14.58%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	19.16%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	19.37%	-2.12%

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQI vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, while MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.61%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQI and MEUD.L in my portfolio?

QQQI and MEUD.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQI or MEUD.L?

On fees, MEUD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQI or MEUD.L?

MEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between QQQI and MEUD.L?

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.15% for MEUD.L.