QQQI vs. IDVY.AS
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and IDVY.AS (iShares Euro Dividend UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while IDVY.AS is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. QQQI is actively managed, while IDVY.AS is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 25.86% vs 22.97% for IDVY.AS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IDVY.AS.
Performance
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQI is traded in USD, while IDVY.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IDVY.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than IDVY.AS's 6.97% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDVY.AS
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 9.93% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
IDVY.AS iShares Euro Dividend UCITS ETF | 6.97% | 60.98% | 2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and IDVY.AS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.21 |
The correlation between QQQI and IDVY.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
IDVY.AS
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and iShares Euro Dividend UCITS ETF (IDVY.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQI | IDVY.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.34 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 7.06 | +4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQI | IDVY.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.66 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.07 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum IDVY.AS drawdown of -73.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and IDVY.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | IDVY.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -73.11% | +53.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -9.77% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -1.69% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -30.52% | +28.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 3.26% | -1.10% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to iShares Euro Dividend UCITS ETF (IDVY.AS) at 4.10%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDVY.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | IDVY.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.10% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 11.14% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.65% | 13.81% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 18.27% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 19.56% | -2.31% |
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IDVY.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQI vs. IDVY.AS - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, more than IDVY.AS's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDVY.AS iShares Euro Dividend UCITS ETF | 3.99% | 4.36% | 5.85% | 5.84% | 5.28% | 3.68% | 3.57% | 4.84% | 4.76% | 3.91% | 3.97% | 4.00% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.61% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQI and IDVY.AS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDVY.AS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDVY.AS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IDVY.AS is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.40% for IDVY.AS.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and IDVY.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer