PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. EUNY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQQI is traded in USD, while EUNY.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNY.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQQI having a 9.93% return and EUNY.DE slightly higher at 10.16%.


QQQI

1D
1.27%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.25%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EUNY.DE

1D
-0.45%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
10.16%
6M
12.47%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
9.93%18.62%19.83%
EUNY.DE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
10.16%28.66%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and EUNY.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.36

The correlation between QQQI and EUNY.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNY.DE
EUNY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EUNY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQIEUNY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.80

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

13.42

-1.44

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the EUNY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and EUNY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQIEUNY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.06

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

0.18

+1.03

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum EUNY.DE drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and EUNY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIEUNY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-48.41%

+28.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-5.73%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-3.96%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-15.76%

+13.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.05%

+0.11%

Volatility

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQIEUNY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

5.13%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

11.02%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

13.37%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.37%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.83%

-0.58%

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNY.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQI vs. EUNY.DE - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, more than EUNY.DE's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNY.DE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
5.32%5.82%7.72%8.04%9.56%6.35%5.09%5.57%5.65%4.09%4.35%6.37%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.61%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQI and EUNY.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNY.DE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNY.DE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EUNY.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.65% for EUNY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQI and EUNY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer