QQQI vs. ET

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while ET (Energy Transfer LP) is a stock. Over the past year, QQQI returned 25.86% vs 16.21% for ET. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QQQI vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 21.54% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ET

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 21.54%
• 6M: 19.30%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 24.40%
• 5Y*: 21.43%
• 10Y*: 13.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	9.93%	18.62%	19.44%
ET Energy Transfer LP	21.54%	-9.37%	46.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and ET is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.21

The correlation between QQQI and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 69
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQI	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.01	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	1.59	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.18	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	1.62	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.98	3.55	+8.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQI vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQI	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.01	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	0.36	+0.86

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-87.81%	+67.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-10.02%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.26%	-5.15%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-25.74%	+23.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	4.57%	-2.41%

Volatility

QQQI vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	5.27%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	11.84%	-1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	16.12%	-2.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	24.87%	-7.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	35.02%	-17.77%

Dividends

QQQI vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, more than ET's 6.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.90%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.61%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQI and ET in my portfolio?

QQQI and ET have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQI or ET?

ET has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to QQQI (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs ET's -87.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.