QQQI vs. BATS.L
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while BATS.L (British American Tobacco plc) is a stock. Over the past year, QQQI returned 25.86% vs 33.10% for BATS.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QQQI vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQI is traded in USD, while BATS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than BATS.L's 6.61% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATS.L
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 33.10%
- 3Y*
- 32.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
QQQI vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 9.93% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 6.61% | 68.15% | 31.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and BATS.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
BATS.L
QQQI vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQI | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.36 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 5.67 | +6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQI | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.44 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.26 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum BATS.L drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and BATS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -56.29% | +36.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -13.98% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -10.37% | +7.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -17.59% | +15.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 5.82% | -3.66% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 5.07%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 9.64% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 18.51% | -7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.65% | 22.90% | -9.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 21.79% | -4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 24.86% | -7.61% |
Dividends
QQQI vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, more than BATS.L's 5.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 5.40% | 5.70% | 8.18% | 10.06% | 6.64% | 7.89% | 7.77% | 6.28% | 7.81% | 4.35% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.61% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQI and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and BATS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer