QQQ vs. XLV
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.59%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for XLV. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
QQQ vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 21.59%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
QQQ vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.98% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and XLV is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQQ and XLV has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQQ vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
XLV
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
XLV
-
Communication Services
QQQ
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
XLV
-
Healthcare
QQQ
XLV
Industrials
QQQ
XLV
-
Utilities
QQQ
XLV
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
XLV
-
Energy
QQQ
XLV
-
Financial Services
QQQ
XLV
-
Real Estate
QQQ
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
XLV
QQQ vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 1.50 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 3.60 | +7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.05 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.41 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.58 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -39.17% | -43.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -10.47% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -17.11% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -17.11% | -18.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -28.40% | -6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -4.32% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -7.12% | -25.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 4.35% | -1.21% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.02%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 5.02% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 10.66% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 14.99% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 14.76% | +7.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 16.58% | +5.78% |
QQQ vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and XLV have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to XLV (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 9.65% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.08% for XLV.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer