PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed XLB with an annualized return of 21.59%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
1.56%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.71%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
21.59%

XLB

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
10.66%
6M
16.01%
1Y
16.06%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and XLB is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.57

The correlation between QQQ and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
XLB

Technology

53.8%

-

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
1.5%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
87.6%

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQQ
53.8%
XLB

-

Communication Services

QQQ
15.8%
XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
12.3%
XLB
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
7.7%
XLB

-

Healthcare

QQQ
4.2%
XLB

-

Industrials

QQQ
2.8%
XLB
1.5%

Utilities

QQQ
1.4%
XLB

-

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.1%
XLB
87.6%

Energy

QQQ
0.6%
XLB

-

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
XLB

-

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.30

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

4.02

+7.41

QQQ vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQXLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

0.95

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.27

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.48

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.35

+0.05

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than XLB's maximum drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-59.83%

-23.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-12.38%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-23.17%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-24.72%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-37.27%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-6.41%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-10.84%

-21.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.00%

-0.86%

Volatility

QQQ vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.32%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

5.32%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

13.02%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

16.95%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

18.96%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

20.66%

+1.70%

QQQ vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQ vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than XLB's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.75%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and XLB have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to XLB (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 9.85% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLB is Materials. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.13% for XLB.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer