PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. WOSC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQQ is traded in USD, while WOSC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WOSC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than WOSC.L's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed WOSC.L with an annualized return of 21.59%, while WOSC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
1.56%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.71%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
21.59%

WOSC.L

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
12.05%
6M
13.40%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
12.05%20.20%7.59%15.76%-18.52%15.21%15.67%26.98%-14.73%21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and WOSC.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2013

0.47

The correlation between QQQ and WOSC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (10 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
WOSC.L

Technology

53.8%
13.4%

Communication Services

15.8%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
9.5%

Industrials

2.8%
20.5%

Utilities

1.4%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.1%
8.2%

Energy

0.6%
5.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
13.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
8.2%

Technology

QQQ
53.8%
WOSC.L
13.4%

Communication Services

QQQ
15.8%
WOSC.L
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
12.3%
WOSC.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
7.7%
WOSC.L
4.2%

Healthcare

QQQ
4.2%
WOSC.L
9.5%

Industrials

QQQ
2.8%
WOSC.L
20.5%

Utilities

QQQ
1.4%
WOSC.L
2.8%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.1%
WOSC.L
8.2%

Energy

QQQ
0.6%
WOSC.L
5.6%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
WOSC.L
13.6%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
WOSC.L
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. WOSC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQWOSC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.24

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

11.74

-0.30

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and WOSC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQWOSC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.04

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.28

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.42

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.19

+0.22

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than WOSC.L's maximum drawdown of -45.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and WOSC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQWOSC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-45.31%

-37.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-9.03%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-20.19%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-31.13%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-42.76%

+7.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-1.69%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-17.50%

-15.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.50%

+0.64%

Volatility

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQWOSC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

4.22%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

10.67%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

14.33%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

22.19%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

23.94%

-1.58%

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WOSC.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ vs. WOSC.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while WOSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and WOSC.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while WOSC.L is Global Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.45% for WOSC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and WOSC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer