QQQ vs. NOBL
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.59%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for NOBL. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
QQQ vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 21.59%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
QQQ vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.55% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and NOBL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQQ and NOBL has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQQ vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
NOBL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ
NOBL
Communication Services
QQQ
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
NOBL
Healthcare
QQQ
NOBL
Industrials
QQQ
NOBL
Utilities
QQQ
NOBL
Basic Materials
QQQ
NOBL
Energy
QQQ
NOBL
Financial Services
QQQ
NOBL
Real Estate
QQQ
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
NOBL
QQQ vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.15 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 1.10 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 2.83 | +8.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 0.88 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.38 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.58 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -35.43% | -47.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -9.11% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -15.36% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -17.92% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -35.43% | +0.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -5.05% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -3.48% | -29.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.54% | -0.40% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.49%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 2.49% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 8.08% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 11.39% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 14.39% | +8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 16.61% | +5.75% |
QQQ vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than NOBL's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.10% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and NOBL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to NOBL (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 9.58% for NOBL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while NOBL is Dividend. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.35% for NOBL.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer