PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQ.L vs. SAABY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQ.L is traded in GBp, while SAABY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SAABY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQ.L achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than SAABY's -2.15% return.


QQ.L

1D
1.06%
1M
12.89%
YTD
8.36%
6M
13.56%
1Y
-12.02%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
9.42%

SAABY

1D
1.53%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-2.15%
6M
4.26%
1Y
7.99%
3Y*
57.68%
5Y*
52.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
8.36%8.34%37.22%-11.50%37.15%-15.08%1.62%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
-2.15%157.79%42.30%39.72%87.16%-48.31%67.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QQ.L and SAABY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.24

Over the past year, QQ.L and SAABY have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QQ.L:

£2.48B

SAABY:

$30.33B

EPS

QQ.L:

-£0.14

SAABY:

$5.98

PS Ratio

QQ.L:

0.67

SAABY:

0.37

PB Ratio

QQ.L:

4.49

SAABY:

0.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

QQ.L:

£3.85B

SAABY:

$82.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QQ.L:

£372.10M

SAABY:

$17.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

QQ.L:

£533.20M

SAABY:

$9.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQ.L vs. SAABY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQ.L
QQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SAABY
SAABY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SAABY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAABY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAABY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SAABY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAABY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Saab AB (publ) (SAABY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQ.LSAABYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.07

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

0.23

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

0.58

-1.47

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQ.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the SAABY Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQ.L and SAABY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQ.LSAABYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

0.17

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

1.14

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.75

-0.48

Drawdowns

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQ.L drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SAABY drawdown of -54.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQ.L and SAABY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQ.LSAABYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.68%

-54.94%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.90%

-35.47%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.77%

-35.47%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.77%

-35.47%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.33%

-29.23%

+13.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-17.82%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.72%

13.84%

-1.12%

Volatility

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) is 11.81%, while Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) has a volatility of 15.42%. This indicates that QQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAABY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQ.LSAABYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

15.42%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.30%

31.57%

-9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.48%

48.44%

-16.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.20%

46.71%

-15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.89%

57.43%

-28.54%

Dividends

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Dividend Comparison

QQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than SAABY's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
1.90%2.00%1.99%2.49%2.04%2.59%2.06%1.84%2.20%2.60%2.17%1.99%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
0.42%0.36%0.73%0.84%1.24%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QinetiQ Group plc and Saab AB (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
1.02B
19.16B
(QQ.L) Total Revenue
(SAABY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. QQ.L values in GBp, SAABY values in USD

QQ.L vs. SAABY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between QinetiQ Group plc and Saab AB (publ) over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
10.8%
23.4%
Portfolio components
QQ.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

SAABY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 19.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

QQ.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

SAABY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

QQ.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

SAABY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QQ.L and SAABY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQ.L and SAABY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer