PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQ.L vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QQ.L vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQ.L is traded in GBp, while RIO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RIO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQ.L achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 30.63% return. Over the past 10 years, QQ.L has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 9.42%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.53% annualized return.


QQ.L

1D
1.06%
1M
12.89%
YTD
8.36%
6M
13.56%
1Y
-12.02%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
9.42%

RIO

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
30.63%
6M
41.56%
1Y
82.11%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
22.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQ.L vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
8.36%8.34%37.22%-11.50%37.15%-15.08%-8.68%27.80%27.13%-9.87%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
30.90%34.17%-13.88%5.51%32.56%-2.76%32.22%28.11%2.83%32.35%

Correlation

The correlation between QQ.L and RIO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QQ.L:

£2.48B

RIO:

$165.37B

EPS

QQ.L:

-£0.14

RIO:

$13.11

PS Ratio

QQ.L:

0.67

RIO:

1.48

PB Ratio

QQ.L:

4.49

RIO:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

QQ.L:

£3.85B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QQ.L:

£372.10M

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

QQ.L:

£533.20M

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQ.L vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQ.L
QQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQ.L vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQ.LRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.48

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

5.97

-6.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

24.05

-24.94

QQ.L vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQ.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQ.L and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQ.LRIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

3.11

-3.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.46

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.79

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.25

+0.02

Drawdowns

QQ.L vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQ.L drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQ.L and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQ.LRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.68%

-85.30%

+29.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.90%

-13.82%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.77%

-24.61%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.77%

-27.80%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.09%

-33.21%

-4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.33%

-8.97%

-6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-25.08%

+8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.72%

3.42%

+9.30%

Volatility

QQ.L vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 10.53%. This indicates that QQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQ.LRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

10.53%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.30%

21.75%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.48%

26.56%

+4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.20%

26.41%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.89%

28.76%

+0.13%

Dividends

QQ.L vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

QQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than RIO's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
1.90%2.00%1.99%2.49%2.04%2.59%2.06%1.84%2.20%2.60%2.17%1.99%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.98%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

QQ.L vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QinetiQ Group plc and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
1.02B
30.65B
(QQ.L) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. QQ.L values in GBp, RIO values in USD

QQ.L vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between QinetiQ Group plc and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
10.8%
26.6%
Portfolio components
QQ.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

QQ.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

QQ.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QQ.L and RIO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQ.L and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer