PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQ.L vs. KOG.OL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KOG.OL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQ.L is traded in GBp, while KOG.OL is traded in NOK. To make them comparable, the KOG.OL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQ.L achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than KOG.OL's 28.43% return. Over the past 10 years, QQ.L has underperformed KOG.OL with an annualized return of 9.42%, while KOG.OL has yielded a comparatively higher 36.54% annualized return.


QQ.L

1D
1.06%
1M
12.89%
YTD
8.36%
6M
13.56%
1Y
-12.02%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
9.42%

KOG.OL

1D
-0.83%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
28.43%
6M
31.66%
1Y
-7.74%
3Y*
55.99%
5Y*
58.79%
10Y*
36.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
8.36%8.34%37.22%-11.50%37.15%-15.08%-8.68%27.80%27.13%-9.87%
KOG.OL
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
28.43%7.41%153.69%16.87%90.16%63.67%35.91%14.40%-8.65%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QQ.L and KOG.OL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.23

Over the past year, QQ.L and KOG.OL have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQ.L
QQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

KOG.OL
KOG.OL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
KOG.OL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOG.OL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOG.OL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
KOG.OL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOG.OL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KOG.OL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQ.LKOG.OLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.02

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

-0.18

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

-0.32

-0.56

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQ.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the KOG.OL Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQ.L and KOG.OL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQ.LKOG.OLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

-0.15

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

1.51

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

1.02

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.67

-0.40

Drawdowns

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQ.L drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, which is greater than KOG.OL's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQ.L and KOG.OL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQ.LKOG.OLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.68%

-47.60%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.90%

-41.04%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.77%

-41.04%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.77%

-41.04%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.09%

-47.60%

+9.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.33%

-26.09%

+10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-17.74%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.72%

22.42%

-9.70%

Volatility

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Volatility Comparison

QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KOG.OL) at 11.09%. This indicates that QQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOG.OL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQ.LKOG.OLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

11.09%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.30%

37.07%

-14.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.48%

48.85%

-17.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.20%

39.00%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.89%

36.17%

-7.28%

Dividends

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Dividend Comparison

QQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than KOG.OL's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KOG.OL
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
1.60%1.41%0.90%12.89%18.41%2.31%5.86%1.50%2.29%2.05%2.82%2.42%
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
1.90%2.00%1.99%2.49%2.04%2.59%2.06%1.84%2.20%2.60%2.17%1.99%

Financials

QQ.L vs. KOG.OL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QinetiQ Group plc and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. QQ.L values in GBp, KOG.OL values in NOK

Frequently Asked Questions


QQ.L and KOG.OL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQ.L and KOG.OL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer