PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVO vs. VWRL.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (VWRL.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDVO is traded in USD, while VWRL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VWRL.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.AS's 11.59% return.


QDVO

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.16%
1Y
23.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VWRL.AS

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.08%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.87%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
7.53%20.16%11.80%
VWRL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
11.59%22.96%2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and VWRL.AS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024

0.53

The correlation between QDVO and VWRL.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRL.AS
VWRL.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VWRL.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVOVWRL.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.17

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

13.66

-4.18

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the VWRL.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVO and VWRL.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVOVWRL.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.36

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.70

+0.62

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum VWRL.AS drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and VWRL.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVOVWRL.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-33.75%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-8.89%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-0.78%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-4.79%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.08%

+0.44%

Volatility

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (VWRL.AS) at 3.46%. This indicates that QDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVOVWRL.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.46%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

9.19%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

11.98%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

15.24%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

15.70%

+1.80%

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.AS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVO vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.34%, more than VWRL.AS's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.34%9.92%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
1.24%1.42%1.47%1.74%2.10%1.43%1.56%1.89%2.24%1.93%1.95%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVO and VWRL.AS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRL.AS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRL.AS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.

QDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while VWRL.AS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.19% for VWRL.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVO and VWRL.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer