QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO
QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while TXF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by CI Investments. Both are actively managed. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for TXF.TO.
Performance
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TXF.TO
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 24.61%
- 6M
- 23.22%
- 1Y
- 53.57%
- 3Y*
- 30.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- 19.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDAY.NEO
TXF.TO
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDAY.NEO | TXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.78 | — |
Drawdowns
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDAY.NEO | TXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -41.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.42% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.18% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDAY.NEO | TXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.13% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 24.79% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 23.64% | — |
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TXF.TO's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDAY.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common | 9.63% | 10.59% | 9.75% | 7.48% | 14.13% | 7.77% | 11.01% | 7.29% | 9.29% | 4.89% | 6.16% | 6.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TXF.TO is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while TXF.TO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and CI Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.71% for TXF.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and TXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer