PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QDAY.NEO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TXF.TO

1D
2.08%
1M
4.83%
YTD
24.61%
6M
23.22%
1Y
53.57%
3Y*
30.64%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
19.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDAY.NEO

TXF.TO
TXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDAY.NEOTXF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

Drawdowns

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDAY.NEOTXF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

Volatility

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDAY.NEOTXF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TXF.TO's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDAY.NEO vs. TXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

QDAY.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDAY.NEO
Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common
9.63%10.59%9.75%7.48%14.13%7.77%11.01%7.29%9.29%4.89%6.16%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, TXF.TO is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.

QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while TXF.TO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and CI Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.71% for TXF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and TXF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer