QDAY.NEO vs. NXF.TO
QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while NXF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed.
Performance
QDAY.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXF.TO
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 30.32%
- 6M
- 29.84%
- 1Y
- 43.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDAY.NEO vs. NXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDAY.NEO
NXF.TO
QDAY.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDAY.NEO | NXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.21 | — |
Drawdowns
QDAY.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDAY.NEO | NXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -65.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -6.52% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.00% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.37% | — |
Volatility
QDAY.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDAY.NEO | NXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.58% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 23.42% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 26.16% | — |
Dividends
QDAY.NEO vs. NXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDAY.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) | 8.17% | 7.70% | 8.50% | 8.60% | 11.22% | 9.46% | 11.24% | 7.83% | 9.39% | 6.49% | 8.24% | 8.21% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while NXF.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and CI.
Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and NXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer