QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO
QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. QDAY.NEO is actively managed, while HXQ.TO is passively managed. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.
Performance
QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 38.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 22.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDAY.NEO
HXQ.TO
QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDAY.NEO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.06 | — |
Drawdowns
QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDAY.NEO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -31.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.52% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.75% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.88% | — |
Volatility
QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDAY.NEO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.27% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.85% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.89% | — |
QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDAY.NEO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDAY.NEO nor HXQ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Horizons. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer