QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO
QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HPYM.TO.
Performance
QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDAY.NEO
HPYM.TO
QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDAY.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.34 | — |
Drawdowns
QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDAY.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.11% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.94% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.40% | — |
Volatility
QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDAY.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 5.60% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 5.60% | — |
QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HPYM.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDAY.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDAY.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.42% | 9.01% | 8.07% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HPYM.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPYM.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HPYM.TO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.45% for HPYM.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and HPYM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer