QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO
QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and HBND.TO ( Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while HBND.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HBND.TO.
Performance
QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBND.TO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDAY.NEO
HBND.TO
QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDAY.NEO | HBND.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.01 | — |
Drawdowns
QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDAY.NEO | HBND.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -8.62% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.50% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDAY.NEO | HBND.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.54% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 11.31% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 11.31% | — |
QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HBND.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDAY.NEO vs. HBND.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDAY.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HBND.TO Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 11.41% | 11.84% | 11.51% | 2.41% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HBND.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBND.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBND.TO is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.45% for HBND.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and HBND.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer