QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO
QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDAY.NEO
CASH.TO
QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDAY.NEO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 5.50 | — |
Drawdowns
QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDAY.NEO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.00% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDAY.NEO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.61% | — |
QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDAY.NEO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDAY.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer