QCOM vs. MRVL
QCOM (QUALCOMM Incorporated) and MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, QCOM returned 18.18%/yr vs 41.26%/yr for MRVL. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QCOM vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCOM achieves a 28.60% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 240.32% return. Over the past 10 years, QCOM has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 18.18%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 41.26% annualized return.
QCOM
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 28.60%
- 6M
- 25.48%
- 1Y
- 48.99%
- 3Y*
- 24.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.18%
MRVL
- 1D
- 9.63%
- 1M
- 69.78%
- YTD
- 240.32%
- 6M
- 214.35%
- 1Y
- 323.75%
- 3Y*
- 69.41%
- 5Y*
- 42.37%
- 10Y*
- 41.26%
QCOM vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 28.60% | 13.84% | 8.31% | 35.07% | -38.58% | 22.25% | 77.08% | 60.76% | -7.59% | 2.05% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 240.32% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCOM and MRVL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.50 |
The correlation between QCOM and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QCOM:
$233.45B
MRVL:
$258.03B
QCOM:
$9.11
MRVL:
$2.90
QCOM:
23.89
MRVL:
99.74
QCOM:
5.33
MRVL:
28.91
QCOM:
8.56
MRVL:
14.17
QCOM:
$44.49B
MRVL:
$8.72B
QCOM:
$24.38B
MRVL:
$4.41B
QCOM:
$12.92B
MRVL:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCOM vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
QCOM
MRVL
QCOM vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCOM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.59 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 12.37 | -10.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 28.64 | -25.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCOM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 4.70 | -3.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.69 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.80 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.23 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
QCOM vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCOM drawdown since its inception was -86.75%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCOM and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCOM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.75% | -91.60% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.13% | -26.36% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.23% | -60.79% | +16.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.29% | -61.88% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.29% | -61.88% | +17.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.93% | -8.72% | -4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.88% | -46.77% | +13.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 11.37% | +3.33% |
Volatility
QCOM vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is 29.80%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 38.50%. This indicates that QCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCOM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.80% | 38.50% | -8.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.61% | 54.32% | -13.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.39% | 69.56% | -22.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.86% | 61.51% | -20.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.13% | 51.77% | -12.64% |
Dividends
QCOM vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than MRVL's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 1.65% | 2.06% | 2.18% | 2.18% | 2.67% | 1.47% | 1.69% | 2.81% | 4.27% | 3.50% | 3.17% | 3.72% |
Financials
QCOM vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QUALCOMM Incorporated and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QCOM vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
QCOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a gross profit of 5.70B and revenue of 10.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.8%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
QCOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported an operating income of 2.31B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
QCOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a net income of 7.37B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in a net margin of 69.5%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QCOM and MRVL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to QCOM (29.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCOM dropped -86.75% vs MRVL's -91.60%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCOM and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer