QBTS vs. CIFR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 125.25%/yr vs 119.40%/yr for CIFR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QBTS vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 64.57% return.

QBTS

• 1D: 8.30%
• 1M: 14.44%
• YTD: -1.22%
• 6M: -9.18%
• 1Y: 38.72%
• 3Y*: 125.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFR

• 1D: 8.20%
• 1M: 18.20%
• YTD: 64.57%
• 6M: 24.69%
• 1Y: 522.82%
• 3Y*: 119.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTS vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	-1.22%	211.31%	854.44%	-38.88%	-83.96%
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc.	64.57%	218.10%	12.35%	637.50%	-74.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTS and CIFR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022	0.32

The correlation between QBTS and CIFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap QBTS : $9.49B CIFR : $9.84B
EPS QBTS : -$1.08 CIFR : -$2.33
PS Ratio QBTS : 704.19 CIFR : 53.38
PB Ratio QBTS : 8.44 CIFR : 13.78
Total Revenue (TTM) QBTS : $12.44M CIFR : $174.98M
Gross Profit (TTM) QBTS : $8.25M CIFR : -$172.84M
EBITDA (TTM) QBTS : -$399.03M CIFR : -$169.22M

Return for Risk

QBTS vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 57
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CIFR

CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 96
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTS vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBTS	CIFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	4.86	-4.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	3.84	-2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.45	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	10.27	-9.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.96	20.60	-19.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBTS vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTS Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTS and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTS	CIFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	4.86	-4.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.16	+0.02

Drawdowns

QBTS vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and CIFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTS	CIFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.67%	-97.16%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.01%	-51.38%	-19.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.17%	-71.74%	-7.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.32%	-7.61%	-34.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.80%	-66.47%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.50%	25.55%	+14.95%

Volatility

QBTS vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.76% compared to Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) at 27.70%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTS	CIFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	42.76%	27.70%	+15.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.88%	70.95%	+5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	108.49%	108.62%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.19%	122.03%	+29.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.19%	122.03%	+29.16%

Dividends

QBTS vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTS nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTS and CIFR in my portfolio?

QBTS and CIFR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBTS or CIFR?

QBTS has higher volatility (42.76%) compared to CIFR (27.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.