PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Quebecor Inc (QBR-B.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBR-B.TO achieves a 32.54% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -26.55% return. Over the past 10 years, QBR-B.TO has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 16.78%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 32.96% annualized return.


QBR-B.TO

1D
-0.51%
1M
19.79%
YTD
32.54%
6M
34.22%
1Y
77.74%
3Y*
32.13%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
16.78%

LUG.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
-13.90%
YTD
-26.55%
6M
-23.60%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
78.91%
5Y*
53.88%
10Y*
32.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QBR-B.TO
Quebecor Inc
32.54%69.85%4.16%8.44%10.30%-9.74%1.42%16.74%22.16%28.07%
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
-26.55%291.22%91.60%29.55%30.60%-4.67%31.21%66.93%10.15%-13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between QBR-B.TO and LUG.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QBR-B.TO:

CA$15.65B

LUG.TO:

CA$19.02B

EPS

QBR-B.TO:

CA$3.85

LUG.TO:

CA$3.77

PE Ratio

QBR-B.TO:

17.58

LUG.TO:

20.77

PEG Ratio

QBR-B.TO:

1.47

LUG.TO:

0.28

PS Ratio

QBR-B.TO:

2.73

LUG.TO:

9.50

PB Ratio

QBR-B.TO:

5.84

LUG.TO:

13.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

QBR-B.TO:

CA$5.73B

LUG.TO:

CA$2.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QBR-B.TO:

CA$2.22B

LUG.TO:

CA$1.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

QBR-B.TO:

CA$2.40B

LUG.TO:

CA$1.43B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBR-B.TO
QBR-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
QBR-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBR-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBR-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QBR-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBR-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LUG.TO
LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quebecor Inc (QBR-B.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBR-B.TOLUG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.11

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

0.58

+6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.92

1.50

+20.42

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBR-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBR-B.TO and LUG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBR-B.TOLUG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

0.36

+2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.17

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.76

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.12

+0.47

Drawdowns

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBR-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -65.30%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -94.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBR-B.TO and LUG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBR-B.TOLUG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.30%

-94.74%

+29.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-35.14%

+23.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.43%

-35.14%

+16.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.07%

-38.94%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.06%

-41.84%

+11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-34.86%

+31.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-67.65%

+57.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

13.50%

-9.94%

Volatility

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quebecor Inc (QBR-B.TO) is 10.39%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that QBR-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBR-B.TOLUG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.39%

17.75%

-7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

41.85%

-23.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.02%

56.10%

-32.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

46.53%

-25.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

43.39%

-22.48%

Dividends

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

QBR-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than LUG.TO's 5.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
5.30%3.35%2.69%3.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QBR-B.TO
Quebecor Inc
2.22%2.71%4.13%3.81%3.97%3.85%2.44%1.18%0.67%0.77%0.91%0.77%

Financials

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quebecor Inc and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.40B
567.38M
(QBR-B.TO) Total Revenue
(LUG.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

QBR-B.TO vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quebecor Inc and Lundin Gold Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
43.6%
74.2%
Portfolio components
QBR-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a gross profit of 608.10M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

LUG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.

QBR-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported an operating income of 367.20M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

LUG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.

QBR-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quebecor Inc reported a net income of 225.40M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

LUG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBR-B.TO and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBR-B.TO and LUG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer