PZG vs. WOR
PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) and WOR (Worthington Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while WOR operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PZG returned -3.20%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for WOR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PZG vs. WOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZG achieves a -7.14% return, which is significantly lower than WOR's 12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PZG has underperformed WOR with an annualized return of -3.20%, while WOR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.
PZG
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 103.90%
- 3Y*
- 59.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
WOR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 6.25%
- YTD
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -2.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
PZG vs. WOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -7.14% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 51.28% | -6.82% | -36.15% | -26.97% |
WOR Worthington Industries, Inc. | 12.61% | 30.29% | -29.34% | 91.65% | -6.90% | 8.43% | 25.21% | 24.08% | -19.30% | -5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZG and WOR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2006 | 0.16 |
The correlation between PZG and WOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PZG:
$97.27M
WOR:
$2.84B
PZG:
-$0.09
WOR:
$2.27
PZG:
2.75
WOR:
2.84
PZG:
$0.00
WOR:
$1.33B
PZG:
-$892.14K
WOR:
$369.08M
PZG:
-$11.01M
WOR:
$159.44M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZG vs. WOR — Risk / Return Rank
PZG
WOR
PZG vs. WOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZG | WOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.01 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.09 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | -0.17 | +4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZG | WOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | -0.09 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.24 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.28 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.24 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
PZG vs. WOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZG drawdown since its inception was -93.81%, which is greater than WOR's maximum drawdown of -70.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZG and WOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZG | WOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.81% | -70.94% | -22.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.18% | -29.83% | -26.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.18% | -42.42% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.05% | -42.42% | -31.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.14% | -64.53% | -25.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.53% | -13.28% | -60.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.57% | -20.23% | -48.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.43% | 16.02% | +6.41% |
Volatility
PZG vs. WOR - Volatility Comparison
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) at 6.93%. This indicates that PZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZG | WOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | 6.93% | +12.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.36% | 20.48% | +37.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.88% | 28.95% | +43.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.90% | 38.24% | +24.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.72% | 39.98% | +20.74% |
Dividends
PZG vs. WOR - Dividend Comparison
PZG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WOR Worthington Industries, Inc. | 1.28% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 49.97% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 1.91% | 2.23% | 2.53% | 1.86% | 1.64% | 2.46% |
Financials
PZG vs. WOR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. and Worthington Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PZG and WOR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to WOR (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZG dropped -93.81% vs WOR's -70.94%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZG and WOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer