PZG vs. TRAK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) and TRAK (Park City Group Inc) are both stocks. PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past year, PZG returned 103.90% vs -54.07% for TRAK. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PZG vs. TRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZG achieves a -7.14% return, which is significantly higher than TRAK's -18.70% return.

PZG

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -18.75%
• YTD: -7.14%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 103.90%
• 3Y*: 59.19%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: -3.20%

TRAK

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -18.70%
• 6M: -25.66%
• 1Y: -54.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZG vs. TRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.	-7.14%	268.42%	-20.45%
TRAK Park City Group Inc	-18.70%	-43.84%	19.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PZG and TRAK is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024	0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap PZG : $97.27M TRAK : $188.95M
EPS PZG : -$0.09 TRAK : $104.56
PB Ratio PZG : 2.75 TRAK : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) PZG : $0.00 TRAK : $5.90B
Gross Profit (TTM) PZG : -$892.14K TRAK : $5.09B
EBITDA (TTM) PZG : -$11.01M TRAK : $1.63B

Return for Risk

PZG vs. TRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZG

PZG Risk / Return Rank: 77
PZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PZG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PZG Martin Ratio Rank: 75

TRAK

TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 6
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZG vs. TRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PZG	TRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	-1.26	+2.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	-2.15	+4.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.76	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	-0.81	+2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	-1.27	+5.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PZG vs. TRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the TRAK Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZG and TRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PZG	TRAK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	-1.26	+2.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	-0.76	+0.67

Drawdowns

PZG vs. TRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZG drawdown since its inception was -93.81%, which is greater than TRAK's maximum drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZG and TRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZG	TRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.81%	-70.93%	-22.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.18%	-67.03%	+10.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.53%	-59.11%	-14.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.57%	-32.19%	-36.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.43%	43.10%	-20.67%

Volatility

PZG vs. TRAK - Volatility Comparison

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Park City Group Inc (TRAK) at 12.23%. This indicates that PZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PZG	TRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.29%	12.23%	+7.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.36%	33.26%	+25.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.88%	43.17%	+29.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.90%	40.79%	+22.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.72%	40.79%	+19.93%

Dividends

PZG vs. TRAK - Dividend Comparison

PZG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRAK Park City Group Inc	0.78%	0.62%	0.16%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PZG and TRAK in my portfolio?

PZG and TRAK have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PZG or TRAK?

PZG has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to TRAK (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZG dropped -93.81% vs TRAK's -70.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.