PZG vs. SCS
PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) and SCS (Steelcase Inc.) are both stocks. PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while SCS operates in Business Equipment & Supplies (Industrials). At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PZG vs. SCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZG
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 103.90%
- 3Y*
- 59.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
SCS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZG vs. SCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -7.14% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 51.28% | -6.82% | -36.15% | -26.97% |
SCS Steelcase Inc. | 0.00% | 39.89% | -9.11% | 97.75% | -36.31% | -9.87% | -31.43% | 42.60% | 1.19% | -12.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZG and SCS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2006 | 0.10 |
The correlation between PZG and SCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PZG:
$97.27M
SCS:
$1.93B
PZG:
-$0.09
SCS:
$0.80
PZG:
2.75
SCS:
1.89
PZG:
$0.00
SCS:
$3.26B
PZG:
-$892.14K
SCS:
$1.09B
PZG:
-$11.01M
SCS:
$208.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZG vs. SCS — Risk / Return Rank
PZG
SCS
PZG vs. SCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZG | SCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZG | SCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PZG vs. SCS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZG | SCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.53% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.43% | — | — |
Volatility
PZG vs. SCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZG | SCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.88% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.90% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.72% | — | — |
Dividends
PZG vs. SCS - Dividend Comparison
Neither PZG nor SCS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCS Steelcase Inc. | 1.24% | 1.86% | 4.23% | 2.22% | 6.93% | 4.56% | 2.73% | 2.83% | 3.64% | 3.36% | 3.31% | 2.27% |
Financials
PZG vs. SCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. and Steelcase Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PZG and SCS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PZG and SCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer