PZG vs. LW
PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, PZG returned 2.58%/yr vs -10.73%/yr for LW. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PZG vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZG achieves a -7.14% return, which is significantly lower than LW's 3.41% return.
PZG
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 103.90%
- 3Y*
- 59.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
LW
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- -27.23%
- 1Y
- -21.23%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
PZG vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -7.14% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 51.28% | -6.82% | -36.15% | -26.97% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.41% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZG and LW is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2016 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
PZG:
$97.27M
LW:
$5.93B
PZG:
-$0.09
LW:
$2.15
PZG:
2.75
LW:
3.25
PZG:
$0.00
LW:
$6.52B
PZG:
-$892.14K
LW:
$1.34B
PZG:
-$11.01M
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZG vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
PZG
LW
PZG vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZG | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.94 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.52 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | -0.90 | +5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZG | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | -0.48 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | -0.29 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.15 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
PZG vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZG drawdown since its inception was -93.81%, which is greater than LW's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZG and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZG | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.81% | -64.56% | -29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.18% | -41.37% | -14.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.18% | -64.56% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.05% | -64.56% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.53% | -60.44% | -13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.57% | -21.26% | -47.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.43% | 23.67% | -1.24% |
Volatility
PZG vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 10.14%. This indicates that PZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZG | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | 10.14% | +9.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.36% | 38.17% | +20.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.88% | 44.22% | +28.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.90% | 37.84% | +25.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.72% | 35.85% | +24.87% |
Dividends
PZG vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
PZG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.52% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PZG vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PZG and LW have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to LW (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZG dropped -93.81% vs LW's -64.56%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZG and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer