PZG vs. CNXC
PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) and CNXC (Concentrix Corporation) are both stocks. PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CNXC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PZG returned 2.58%/yr vs -27.31%/yr for CNXC. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PZG vs. CNXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZG achieves a -7.14% return, which is significantly higher than CNXC's -32.63% return.
PZG
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 103.90%
- 3Y*
- 59.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
CNXC
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- -32.63%
- 6M
- -26.68%
- 1Y
- -49.86%
- 3Y*
- -29.25%
- 5Y*
- -27.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PZG vs. CNXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -7.14% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 20.37% |
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | -32.63% | -1.39% | -55.03% | -25.36% | -24.91% | 81.22% | 23.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZG and CNXC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
PZG:
$97.27M
CNXC:
$1.68B
PZG:
-$0.09
CNXC:
-$21.33
PZG:
2.75
CNXC:
0.60
PZG:
$0.00
CNXC:
$9.95B
PZG:
-$892.14K
CNXC:
$3.27B
PZG:
-$11.01M
CNXC:
-$944.68M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZG vs. CNXC — Risk / Return Rank
PZG
CNXC
PZG vs. CNXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) and Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZG | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.87 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.81 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | -1.34 | +5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZG | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | -0.82 | +2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | -0.57 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | -0.33 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
PZG vs. CNXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZG drawdown since its inception was -93.81%, which is greater than CNXC's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZG and CNXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZG | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.81% | -87.86% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.18% | -61.71% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.18% | -76.50% | +20.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.05% | -87.86% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.53% | -85.48% | +11.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.57% | -47.65% | -20.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.43% | 37.32% | -14.89% |
Volatility
PZG vs. CNXC - Volatility Comparison
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a higher volatility of 19.29% compared to Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) at 15.12%. This indicates that PZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZG | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.29% | 15.12% | +4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.36% | 51.98% | +6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.88% | 61.40% | +11.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.90% | 48.26% | +14.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.72% | 49.78% | +10.94% |
Dividends
PZG vs. CNXC - Dividend Comparison
PZG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | 5.16% | 3.27% | 2.87% | 1.15% | 0.77% | 0.14% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PZG vs. CNXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. and Concentrix Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PZG and CNXC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to CNXC (15.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZG dropped -93.81% vs CNXC's -87.86%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZG and CNXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer