PWR vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, PWR returned 56.18%/yr vs 50.33%/yr for CHAT. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

PWR vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 64.46% return, which is significantly higher than CHAT's 58.75% return.

PWR

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -6.87%
• YTD: 64.46%
• 6M: 49.89%
• 1Y: 92.19%
• 3Y*: 56.18%
• 5Y*: 49.77%
• 10Y*: 40.58%

CHAT

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: 8.61%
• YTD: 58.75%
• 6M: 54.05%
• 1Y: 117.08%
• 3Y*: 50.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWR vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	64.46%	33.70%	46.60%	25.70%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	58.75%	49.85%	30.98%	19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and CHAT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023	0.53

The correlation between PWR and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PWR vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 93
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PWR	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	3.63	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.82	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.54	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.45	7.23	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.97	21.00	-3.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PWR vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWR	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	3.63	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.78	-1.43

Drawdowns

PWR vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWR	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.07%	-31.34%	-65.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	-16.28%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.89%	-31.34%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.64%	-9.52%	-2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.86%	-5.36%	-41.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	5.60%	-0.45%

Volatility

PWR vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 11.16%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 15.95%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWR	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.16%	15.95%	-4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.60%	27.06%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.37%	32.47%	+3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.62%	30.45%	+5.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.70%	30.45%	+3.25%

Dividends

PWR vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than CHAT's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.80%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.06%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWR and CHAT in my portfolio?

PWR and CHAT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWR or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to PWR (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.