PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSRW.L vs. TELE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF (TELE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PSRW.L is traded in GBp, while TELE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the TELE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly higher than TELE.L's 2.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PSRW.L has outperformed TELE.L with an annualized return of 12.89%, while TELE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.83% annualized return.


PSRW.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.55%
YTD
14.09%
6M
15.24%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
12.89%

TELE.L

1D
0.82%
1M
1.88%
YTD
2.79%
6M
5.19%
1Y
-5.37%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
2.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
14.09%19.97%12.95%10.09%2.42%22.39%2.67%17.83%-7.86%9.35%
TELE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF
2.79%12.45%10.03%12.18%-6.74%7.60%-7.98%-1.65%-8.24%6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRW.L and TELE.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between PSRW.L and TELE.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSRW.L
TELE.L

Technology

19.9%

-

Financial Services

18.5%

-

Industrials

9.8%

-

Energy

9.0%

-

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Communication Services

7.5%
96.7%

Basic Materials

6.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Utilities

3.5%

-

Real Estate

1.8%
3.3%

Technology

PSRW.L
19.9%
TELE.L

-

Financial Services

PSRW.L
18.5%
TELE.L

-

Industrials

PSRW.L
9.8%
TELE.L

-

Energy

PSRW.L
9.0%
TELE.L

-

Healthcare

PSRW.L
8.8%
TELE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSRW.L
8.7%
TELE.L

-

Communication Services

PSRW.L
7.5%
TELE.L
96.7%

Basic Materials

PSRW.L
6.8%
TELE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

PSRW.L
5.6%
TELE.L

-

Utilities

PSRW.L
3.5%
TELE.L

-

Real Estate

PSRW.L
1.8%
TELE.L
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRW.L
PSRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TELE.L
TELE.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TELE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TELE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TELE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TELE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TELE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF (TELE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSRW.LTELE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

0.95

+0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.15

-0.40

+5.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.85

-0.82

+20.67

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the TELE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRW.L and TELE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSRW.LTELE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56

-0.39

+3.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.39

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.18

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.15

-0.06

Drawdowns

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -78.62%, which is greater than TELE.L's maximum drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and TELE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSRW.LTELE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.62%

-34.21%

-44.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-13.30%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-13.30%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-17.48%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-34.21%

+5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-7.04%

+5.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.74%

-10.76%

-16.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

6.51%

-4.80%

Volatility

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.65%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF (TELE.L) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TELE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSRW.LTELE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

4.01%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

10.62%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.56%

13.61%

-4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

13.65%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.35%

-0.97%

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TELE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSRW.L vs. TELE.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while TELE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
1.77%2.00%2.29%2.46%2.58%1.96%1.99%2.45%2.52%2.03%1.93%2.00%
TELE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Communication Services UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSRW.L and TELE.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TELE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TELE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRW.L.

PSRW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while TELE.L is Communications Equities. PSRW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while TELE.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.18% for TELE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and TELE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer