PRGSX vs. TBUX
PRGSX (T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund) and TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) are both funds - PRGSX is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 3 years, PRGSX returned 21.75%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for TBUX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRGSX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for TBUX.
Performance
PRGSX vs. TBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than TBUX's 1.69% return.
PRGSX
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- 1Y
- 34.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.13%
TBUX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRGSX vs. TBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 16.26% | 21.42% | 16.80% | 25.70% | -28.01% | 0.43% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.69% | 5.37% | 6.38% | 6.39% | -0.13% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGSX and TBUX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRGSX vs. TBUX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGSX
TBUX
PRGSX vs. TBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGSX | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 3.15 | -1.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 48.80 | -46.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.24 | 185.24 | -174.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGSX | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 7.27 | -5.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 3.88 | -3.37 |
Drawdowns
PRGSX vs. TBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than TBUX's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and TBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGSX | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.06% | -1.79% | -62.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -0.10% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.13% | -0.33% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -0.04% | -6.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -0.28% | -13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 0.03% | +3.11% |
Volatility
PRGSX vs. TBUX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) at 0.22%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRGSX | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 0.22% | +7.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 0.46% | +15.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 0.67% | +18.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 1.07% | +18.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 1.07% | +18.77% |
PRGSX vs. TBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TBUX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRGSX vs. TBUX - Dividend Comparison
PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than TBUX's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 8.26% | 9.60% | 6.73% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 13.67% | 5.67% | 2.21% | 5.81% | 0.03% | 0.63% | 0.33% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.67% | 5.39% | 4.66% | 2.58% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRGSX and TBUX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRGSX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to TBUX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs TBUX's -1.79%.
TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.27 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRGSX and TBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer