PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGSX vs. SPMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPMD's 12.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGSX has outperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 16.13%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.


PRGSX

1D
-5.35%
1M
0.01%
YTD
16.26%
6M
16.21%
1Y
34.05%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
16.13%

SPMD

1D
0.23%
1M
0.17%
YTD
12.58%
6M
12.81%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
16.26%21.42%16.80%25.70%-28.01%9.81%52.29%35.84%-4.51%32.64%
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
12.58%7.44%13.91%16.48%-13.13%24.76%13.46%25.19%-10.34%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGSX and SPMD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.79

The correlation between PRGSX and SPMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGSX vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMD
SPMD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRGSXSPMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.61

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

9.55

+1.69

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SPMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGSX and SPMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRGSXSPMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.48

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.40

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.54

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.45

+0.07

Drawdowns

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than SPMD's maximum drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and SPMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGSXSPMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.06%

-57.62%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-8.86%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-24.08%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

-24.08%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-41.86%

+3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.08%

-1.71%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-8.12%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.41%

+0.73%

Volatility

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) at 4.16%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGSXSPMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

4.16%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

11.53%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

15.66%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

19.71%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

21.19%

-1.35%

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGSX vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison

PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than SPMD's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
8.26%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
1.24%1.39%1.42%1.47%1.64%1.24%1.30%1.57%1.85%1.97%2.13%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRGSX and SPMD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGSX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to SPMD (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs SPMD's -57.62%.

PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGSX and SPMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer