PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRCHX vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCHX achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.


PRCHX

1D
-1.20%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.23%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDM

1D
0.25%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.30%
6M
3.19%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PRCHX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I
2.61%13.68%8.92%3.12%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.30%64.20%27.08%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCHX and GLDM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRCHX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCHX
PRCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRCHXGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.53

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.04

3.85

+10.19

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCHX and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRCHXGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.15

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.75

0.99

+0.76

Drawdowns

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCHX drawdown since its inception was -6.10%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCHX and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRCHXGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-21.63%

+15.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.50%

-20.00%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-19.80%

+18.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-6.24%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

7.96%

-7.07%

Volatility

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) is 1.95%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that PRCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRCHXGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

5.65%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

23.31%

-18.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38%

26.65%

-21.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

17.98%

-11.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.55%

16.89%

-10.34%

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRCHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRCHX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

PRCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRCHX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I
5.20%5.08%3.22%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRCHX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to PRCHX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCHX dropped -6.10% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

PRCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRCHX and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer