PPC vs. COST
PPC (Pilgrim's Pride Corporation) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — PPC in Packaged Foods, COST in Discount Stores. Over the past 10 years, PPC returned 3.28%/yr vs 22.25%/yr for COST. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPC vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPC achieves a -25.16% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PPC has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 3.28%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.25% annualized return.
PPC
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -25.16%
- 6M
- -24.01%
- 1Y
- -35.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
PPC vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPC Pilgrim's Pride Corporation | -25.16% | 1.40% | 64.10% | 16.56% | -15.85% | 43.80% | -40.07% | 110.96% | -50.06% | 63.56% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPC and COST is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 1993 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
PPC:
$3.72
COST:
$26.51
PPC:
7.84
COST:
36.77
PPC:
0.01
COST:
2.88
PPC:
0.37
COST:
1.11
PPC:
$18.57B
COST:
$293.59B
PPC:
$2.15B
COST:
$11.12B
PPC:
$1.75B
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPC vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
PPC
COST
PPC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPC | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.98 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.22 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | -0.51 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPC | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.24 | -0.18 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.98 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 1.02 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.59 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
PPC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPC drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPC and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPC | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.63% | -53.39% | -46.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.82% | -15.38% | -27.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.18% | -20.74% | -26.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.18% | -31.40% | -15.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.00% | -31.40% | -30.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.08% | -10.93% | -33.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -13.36% | -25.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.63% | 7.15% | +13.48% |
Volatility
PPC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.71%. This indicates that PPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPC | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 7.71% | +2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.13% | 14.53% | +8.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.45% | 18.79% | +9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 22.71% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.27% | 21.95% | +11.32% |
Dividends
PPC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
PPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
PPC Pilgrim's Pride Corporation | 7.20% | 21.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.48% | 26.12% |
Financials
PPC vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PPC vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
PPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported a gross profit of 345.49M and revenue of 4.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.6%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
PPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported an operating income of 162.56M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
PPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported a net income of 101.42M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPC and COST have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPC has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPC dropped -99.63% vs COST's -53.39%.
COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPC and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer