PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POW.TO vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

POW.TO vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

POW.TO is traded in CAD, while T is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the T values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POW.TO achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly higher than T's -5.71% return. Over the past 10 years, POW.TO has outperformed T with an annualized return of 17.30%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.80% annualized return.


POW.TO

1D
-1.17%
1M
4.52%
YTD
14.92%
6M
19.58%
1Y
65.86%
3Y*
40.57%
5Y*
22.06%
10Y*
17.30%

T

1D
-0.83%
1M
-8.72%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-6.67%
1Y
-14.68%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
3.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POW.TO vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
14.92%69.73%25.05%26.19%-19.21%49.93%-4.91%43.97%-20.10%12.78%
T
AT&T Inc.
-5.71%8.77%56.28%-5.06%12.46%-8.14%-23.24%39.55%-15.72%-10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between POW.TO and T is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.22

The correlation between POW.TO and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

POW.TO:

CA$4.29

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

POW.TO:

19.36

T:

7.39

PS Ratio

POW.TO:

1.53

T:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$34.88B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$30.59B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$6.51B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POW.TO vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POW.TO
POW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
POW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
POW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
POW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
POW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POW.TO vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POW.TOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

0.90

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

-0.69

+5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

-1.41

+15.47

POW.TO vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POW.TO and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POW.TOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

-0.67

+4.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.30

0.40

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.16

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.32

+0.09

Drawdowns

POW.TO vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -42.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW.TO and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POW.TOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-42.44%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-21.49%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-21.49%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-32.89%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.16%

-42.44%

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-21.49%

+20.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-13.77%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

10.43%

-5.73%

Volatility

POW.TO vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) is 6.01%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that POW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POW.TOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

7.35%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

17.38%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

22.07%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

24.41%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.06%

24.30%

-1.24%

Dividends

POW.TO vs. T - Dividend Comparison

POW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than T's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
3.02%3.36%5.02%5.54%6.22%4.40%7.51%4.77%6.13%4.36%4.38%4.23%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.93%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

POW.TO vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Corporation of Canada and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
6.60B
33.47B
(POW.TO) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. POW.TO values in CAD, T values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


POW.TO and T have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POW.TO and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer