PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNNT vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNNT vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNNT achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than XDTE's 6.69% return.


PNNT

1D
-1.30%
1M
-15.02%
YTD
-30.57%
6M
-29.01%
1Y
-33.64%
3Y*
0.71%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
6.83%

XDTE

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
6.69%
6M
6.52%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNNT vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
-30.57%-2.96%17.25%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
6.69%12.60%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PNNT and XDTE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNNT vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNNT
PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNNT vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PNNTXDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.37

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

2.90

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.69

13.13

-14.82

PNNT vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNNT Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNNT and XDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PNNTXDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

1.99

-3.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

1.16

-1.03

Drawdowns

PNNT vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNNT drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNNT and XDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNNTXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.16%

-19.09%

-63.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.61%

-7.68%

-34.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.90%

-2.61%

-38.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-2.31%

-12.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.92%

1.69%

+18.23%

Volatility

PNNT vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a higher volatility of 14.65% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 3.50%. This indicates that PNNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNNTXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.65%

3.50%

+11.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.99%

8.68%

+15.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.16%

11.25%

+15.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.80%

13.92%

+9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.77%

13.92%

+18.85%

Dividends

PNNT vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.20%, less than XDTE's 33.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
25.20%16.11%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
33.68%39.16%20.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PNNT and XDTE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNNT has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to XDTE (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNNT dropped -82.16% vs XDTE's -19.09%.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNNT and XDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer